Bitcoin and Proof-of-Work mining was under lawmaker scrutiny once more, as U.S democrats target PoW mining for noise pollution and electronic waste.
Concerns over the effects of crypto mining and Proof-of-Work mining, in particular, have continued to hit the news wires.
Last month, the European Parliament averted a Bitcoin (BTC) crisis by voting no to a proposed ban on Proof-of-Work (PoW) cryptos. A PoW mining ban would outlaw Bitcoin, Ethereum (ETH), and other PoW cryptos.
While the EU’s vote favored innovation over the impact of PoW mining on the environment, lawmakers remain resolute in the battle against Bitcoin.
On Wednesday, U.S lawmakers turned to the EPA to investigate possible crypto mining infringements of environmental laws.
U.S House of Representatives member Jared Huffman and others sent a letter to the EPA raising concerns over crypto mining in the U.S.
Jared Huffman wrote,
“We applaud President Joe Biden’s Executive Order initiating a sweeping review of the federal government’s approach to cryptocurrencies, including reducing their negative climate impacts and examining the energy use associated with crypto mining.”
Huffman added,
“The rapidly expanding cryptocurrency industry needs to be held accountable to ensure it operates in a sustainable and just manner to protect communities.”
On the issue of waste, Huffman noted,
“PoW mining relies on massive server farms, which, in addition to contributing to significant greenhouse gas emissions, results in major electronic waste challenges due to the highly specialized and short-lived computing hardware needed to secure the network.”
According to the letter,
“Bitcoin mining alone produces almost 30,700 tons of electronic waste each year.”
Huffman then raised the issue of noise pollution, writing,
“Communities around cryptocurrency mining facilities from New York, Tennessee, to Georgia have reported significant noise pollution.”
Considering the environmental concerns, Huffman requested the EPA evaluate compliance with environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. Huffman went further to ask the EPA to investigate and address the impact of PoW mining facilities on communities.
The letter to the EPA follows a U.S Congress subcommittee hearing in January that explored crypto mining and the environment.
In January, Proof-of-Work mining and Bitcoin came under intense government scrutiny.
The Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce held a hearing titled ‘Cleaning Up Cryptocurrency: The Energy Impacts of Blockchains.’
The briefing memorandum provided some PoW mining statistics to generate debate through the hearing. These included,
In addition to the above numbers, there were also several other influencing factors for lawmakers to consider,
With the U.S President’s emissions goals in mind, January’s subcommittee hearing saw Democratic party members reportedly stand “staunchly anti-crypto.”
Since the January hearing, the crypto community has responded with its own crypto mining statistics.
In February, we reported new mining statistics that question the numbers from the briefing memorandum and those used by other anti-crypto lawmakers.
Key statistics from a CoinShares paper titled “The Bitcoin Mining Network, Energy, and Carbon Impact” included,
CoinShares provided an industry breakdown of CO2 emissions for comparison. These included,
With such disparity in numbers, the EPA may provide some further input for a more informed judgment on PoW mining.
With over 20 years of experience in the finance industry, Bob has been managing regional teams across Europe and Asia and focusing on analytics across both corporate and financial institutions. Currently he is covering developments relating to the financial markets, including currencies, commodities, alternative asset classes, and global equities.