Investor speculation about the SEC’s plans regarding its appeal against rulings in the Ripple case intensified over the weekend. James ‘MetaLawMan’ Murphy responded to Ripple Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty’s post on X (formerly Twitter), saying,
“The SEC is taking positions in litigation that we know Commissioner Hester Peirce and acting Chair Mark Uyeda disagree with. These cases need to be terminated. With extreme prejudice.”
On January 24, Alderoty shared comments from Judge Orrick, presiding over the SEC vs. Kraken case, who stated:
“The SEC refers to these assets as the ‘Kraken-Traded Securities.’ As I made clear in my previous order, I will not entertain any theory of liability wherin the SEC asks this court to treat the crypto assets themselves as though they are securities. I am considering the theory that those crypto assets, once sold/traded/exchanged on the Kraken Trading Platform, are investment contracts that form the basis for securities. I will warn the SEC once more to be careful of this distinction.”
Judge Orrick’s comments aligned with Judge Torres’ stance that crypto assets themselves are not securities. Notably, Judge Orrick will apply the Howey test to assess whether the exchange or sale of cryptos on Kraken constitutes an investment contract. The Judge did not entertain the SEC’s broader argument that crypto assets should be classified as securities.
The latest comments from a US Federal Judge underscore Acting Chair Uyeda’s challenge in reining in the agency’s crypto litigators. Prior to leaving, former SEC Chair Gary Gensler strengthened the agency’s legal enforcement division, promoting seasoned crypto litigators to senior positions.
Gensler may have called on these litigators to continue challenging crypto classifications despite an SEC overhaul. The latest attempt to classify crypto as securities suggests the legal team will continue pursuing the appeal in the Ripple case until the Commissioners vote for a withdrawal.
On Sunday, January 26, XRP fell 2.74%, reversing Saturday’s 0.25% gain, closing at $3.0226. XRP underperformed the broader crypto market, which dropped by 2.31% to a total crypto market cap of $3.45 trillion.
XRP’s price trajectory depends heavily on the SEC’s appeal plans. A withdrawal could drive XRP above its all-time high of $3.5505. Conversely, pursuing the appeal could push prices below $2.50.
Explore our expert analysis here on the SEC’s next move and its implications for XRP’s future.
Meanwhile, bitcoin (BTC) faced selling pressure as investors considered US President Trump’s executive orders (EO). On January 23, President Trump signed an EO, establishing the Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets. One of the key tasks will be to evaluate the creation of a strategic national digital assets stockpile.
The EO did not refer to a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR), fueling uncertainty about BTC becoming a strategic reserve asset. However, the EO and the requirements to classify a BTC as a national strategic reserve asset differ. Amicus Curiae attorney John E. Deaton recently highlighted the procedural differences between a stockpile and SBR, stating,
“I’ve been saying for some time: What’s your definition of a SBR? President Trump, via EO, can order that all seized BTC (or any other seized digital asset for that matter) be held in escrow and not sold. If you call that a SBR, then I’m confident we get one. If by SBR, you mean the USG buying BTC, it will take an act of Congress, like the Senator Cynthia Lummis Bill.”
Senator Cynthia Lummis introduced the Bitcoin Act in late 2024, proposing the US government acquire one million BTC over five years, with a mandatory holding period of 20 years.
Approval hinges on consensus among Congress, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department, and the President. The approval process underscores the need for a Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets to present convincing arguments supporting an SBR to Congress and the Fed.
Anthony Scaramucci speculated about the potential for a US SBR ahead of Trump’s inauguration, saying:
“They’ll probably buy another four or five hundred thousand BTC. Let me tell you why I think it will happen ok. Trump wants it to happen and he’s got the Senate Banking Committee. Tim Scott wants it to happen. He’s going to be the chair of the Senate Banking Committee. Bessent wants it to happen.”
Scaramucci was also optimistic about Congress voting for an SBR, referring to the bipartisan vote to withdraw Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121.
While BTC struggled for direction over the weekend, US BTC-spot ETF flow trends reflected market hopes for a US SBR. The US BTC-spot ETF market reported total net inflows of $1,758 million in the week ending January 24. Significantly, the BTC-spot ETF market has seen total net inflows of $15,704 million since Trump’s election victory.
On Sunday, January 26, BTC declined by 2.09% after slipping by 0.02% on Saturday to close at $102,656. Despite Sunday’s retreat, BTC avoided sub-$100k levels for the sixth consecutive session. Resilient BTC demand indicates markets’ confidence in a potential US SBR.
BTC’s price trends hinge on Trump’s executive orders, SBR developments, and US BTC-spot ETF flows.
US BTC-spot ETF inflows and progress toward a US SBR could drive BTC beyond the record high of $108,231. Conversely, slow progress toward an SBR and BTC-spot ETF outflows could pull BTC toward $95k.
XRP and BTC stand at pivotal crossroads, with regulatory and political developments influencing their trajectories. XRP’s future depends on the SEC’s appeal strategy, while BTC’s outlook hinges on Trump administration policies and ETF market trends. Regulatory clarity will play a crucial role in dictating market sentiment in the weeks ahead.
Stay updated with our expert analysis of these developments and their implications for crypto markets. Read more here.
With over 28 years of experience in the financial industry, Bob has worked with various global rating agencies and multinational banks. Currently he is covering currencies, commodities, alternative asset classes and global equities, focusing mostly on European and Asian markets.